The Great Reset is being implemented globally and at the same time

It is being orchestrated by a Global Cabal that trumps the sovereignty of nations and local governments

“I just think it time that we all begin to rise up to this unelected globalist cabal that is poisoning us with EMF radiation, deadly mRNA “gene editing” shots, neurotoxic fluoride in our water supply and nanoparticle toxins in our skies through Geoengineering and Chemtrails.”

Bruce Cain at the Dearborn Heights City Council Meeting, September 23rd, 2025

Summary

As I prepared my talk before the City Council -- “How Citizens can oppose the Globalist Agenda through their City Councils” -- I decided to focus on 2 main themes:

1) All recent globalist initiatives are being implemented globally and at the same time.
That includes Smart Electric Meters (2009), 5G (2019), The Plandemic (2020) and Smart Water Meters (2025)

2) This orchestration requires an unelected global authority that can trump the sovereignty of cities, states and nations

Because I had a bad head cold -- first in over 2 years -- I decided to deliver this speech remotely. That turned out to be a bad decision because they decided not to include my Zoom video feed in the edited taping. So while you can hear my talk you won’t see me delivering it. As I write it has been 4 days since I spoke before the City Council and no one has addressed the primary question: Can residents of Dearborn Heights refuse or Optout of the Smart Water Meters. This should have been addressed by the City Council right after I spoke as these Smart Water Meters are now being rolled out globally. The city is directly involved in this initiative and must know the answer. So why they didn’t answer the question remains a mystery. I have also not heard any feedback 6 Anti-Globalist actions I had asked the City Council to implement. It seems obvious that the City Council really doesn’t take these issues seriously.

=====
Bruce Cain speaking before the Dearborn Heights City Council (09/23/2025)

=====

Here is the unabridged speech:

=====
At the end of this my primary question will be: Can residents of DH refuse or Optout of the Smart Water Meters

I will also provide a transcript of this discussion on my Substack Blog

I’ve been an activist since the Viet Nam War and later spent 20 years advocating for the legalization of Cannabis. So when you go to your local dispensary think of me. For the past decade I have become an Anti-Globalist which is to say I reject the Globalist policies of the UN and other organizations that seek to surveil and control free people throughout the planet. And perhaps the most dangerous globalist policy humanity has ever faced is the current introduction of a digital ID and Digital currency now being pushed by Trump and countries throughout the planet. But there is no point in discussing these issues before our City Councils as they are powerless to do anything about it. But there are things we can do on a local level and I hope to inspire activists to push their local governments to oppose these globalist policies through their city councils.

A few weeks back I got contacted by a DH resident. Apparently she remembered me when I tried to stop the installation of Smart Electric Meters on our homes back around 2012. She asked if I had received a notice regarding the mandatory installation of a Smart Water Meter. I got my first notice a few days later. Now the reason we couldn’t refuse a Smart Electric meter and can’t refuse a Smart Water meter is because the utilities own the meters and the Public Utility Commission (PUC) trumps the authority of the City Council. Similarly with the installation of 5G the FCC trumps the authority of both the state and the city. But the odd thing is that Smart Electric Meters (2009), 5G (2019) and Smart Water Meters (2025) have all been rolled out both globally and at the same time. All three of these technologies allow increased surveillance and control of the global population. The Plandemic (2020-2022) and the mRNA “gene editing shots, which killed 17 million world wide, was also orchestrated globally and at the same time. So there must be an unelected global government that somehow supersedes the sovereignty of all nations, states and cities. Right? That is the only way that these technologies could be rolled out globally and at the same time. It should also be obvious that this unelected global cabal is represented by the UN, the WEF, the WHO and other NGO’s. These groups are composed of the richest and most powerful people on our planet and do not represent the interest of the people. I think it time we all challenged their authority. After all no one elected these globalists.

I don’t want a Smart Water Meter. I’m already paying an extra $10/month to Opt Out of the Smart Electric Meters because I didn’t want to be exposed to the EMF Radiation, the Dirty Electricity and the surveillance that these electric meters are capable of. I also don’t want a Smart Water Meter that is going to cost the citizens of Dearborn Heights about $1300 per installation. And each of us will bare the cost in higher water rates. Sadly, in these matters, the City of DH is not governed by our city council but by an unelected global cabal. The same is true for every city throughout the planet. So currently the best we can hope for is probably an Opt Out Water Meter that we will have to pay extra for.

I hope the next Mayor will do everything they can to implement the following 6 Anti-Globalist actions:

1) No Smart Water Meters on people’s homes,

2) No forced vaccination of teachers, students and public school workers

3) No Fluoride in the Water supply

4) No Chemtrail spraying over our cities

5) No further expansion of 5G/6G technologies and

6) No further LGBTQ, DEI or CRT indoctrination in our schools.

I just think it time that we all begin to rise up to the unelected globalist cabal that is poisoning us with EMF radiation, deadly mRNA “gene editing” shots, neurotoxic fluoride in our water supply and nanoparticle toxins in our skies through Geoengineering and Chemtrails. I just think it time that we stop allowing this global cabal to indoctrinate our children through mindless woke ideologies embedded in their curriculum. The school has no legitimate reason to expose children to these warped sexual and social ideologies. Instead we should be teaching them the Golden Rule -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself -- and critical thinking. We should also focus on making all students proficient in reading, writing and mathematics. I hope the next Mayor pursues these 6 Anti-Globalist actions, for both the good of our community and our children.

I explain this in much greater detail on my Substack blog. So just Google [Bruce Cain Substack] and go to my website and click on “A Template for local resistance to Smart Water Meters and Globalist Policies.”
=====

And here is the essay I was referring to in my speech. It goes into detail on all 6 planks:

=====
This essay is to encourage citizens to go before their city councils to demand 6 Anti-Globalist actions: 1) No Smart Water Meters on people’s homes, 2) No forced vaccination of teachers, students and public school workers 3) No Fluoride in the Water supply 4) No Chemtrail spraying over our cities 5) No further expansion of 5G/6G technologies at the local level and 6) No further LGBTQ, DEI or CRT indoctrination in our schools. With Trump in office there is no better time to make these very reasonable demands. It is high time our City Councils reflect the interests of their citizens.

How Citizens can oppose the Globalist Agenda through their City Councils
A Template for local resistance to Water Smart Meters and Globalist Policies

=====

Two arms of the Globalist Agenda: Stakeholders and Gatekeepers

The other day I asked Google AI “how the globalists use stakeholders and gatekeepers.” Other than labeling this a conspiracy theory the answer was as good as anything I could have written.

=====
The concepts of “globalists,” “stakeholders,” and “gatekeepers” are central to several conspiracy theories that claim a secret cabal of elites controls world events for their own benefit. In these theories, globalists are often portrayed as shadowy figures working to establish a one-world government, while stakeholders and gatekeepers are depicted as the tools used to manipulate and control the population.

“Globalists” in conspiracy theories

In conspiracy theories, the term “globalists” refers to a powerful and secretive cabal of elites who are supposedly implementing a dystopian international governing structure.

* Who they are: Depending on the theory, these elites can include bankers, multinational corporations, secret societies (such as the Illuminati and Freemasons), politicians, and wealthy individuals like George Soros, the Rothschild family, and Bill Gates.

* Their objective: The ultimate goal is to consolidate all power into a single, totalitarian regime that strips people of their individual liberties.

* How they operate: Adherents claim that these elites orchestrate world events, such as economic crashes, wars, and global health crises, to sow civil unrest and advance their agenda.

* Antisemitic roots: Many modern conspiracy theories about a “New World Order” and globalist control have antisemitic roots, claiming that Jewish people are secretly manipulating these events for nefarious purposes.

“Stakeholders” and “stakeholder capitalism”

Within these conspiracy narratives, the concept of “stakeholders” is reinterpreted from its original business definition to a mechanism of elite control.

* Original meaning: The term stakeholder, as defined by organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), refers to all parties who have an interest in a company’s performance, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the community. Stakeholder capitalism is a model where companies create long-term value by balancing the needs of all these groups, not just maximizing profits for shareholders.

* Conspiratorial reframing: Theorists twist this concept, claiming it is a form of collectivism or “creeping communism” that consolidates power in the hands of a privileged elite.

* Social engineering: Conspiracy theories allege that the WEF and other global institutions use stakeholder capitalism and its associated Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics as a means of social engineering. They believe this allows unelected bodies to dictate societal norms and control businesses under the guise of corporate social responsibility.

* Great Reset: The WEF’s “Great Reset” initiative, launched in June 2020, has been heavily targeted by these theories. Theorists claim it is a plot by the global elite to use the COVID-19 pandemic to destroy capitalism, abolish private property, and enforce radical policies to control the global economy.

“Gatekeepers”

In conspiracy theories, gatekeepers are individuals or organizations that control access to information, resources, and influence to maintain the status quo and serve the elite’s interests.

* Identifying gatekeepers: Conspiracists identify gatekeepers based on their control over critical resources, their lack of transparency, and their tendency to silence dissenting voices.

* Media and social media: The mainstream media is often portrayed as a key gatekeeper, accused of controlling narratives and suppressing information that contradicts the official story. Social media companies are also seen as gatekeepers who use algorithms to censor content and shape public opinion in favor of the globalist agenda.

* Academia and institutions: Academia, scientific institutions, and think tanks are also cast as gatekeepers that control what is considered legitimate knowledge. The Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, for instance, are sometimes accused of being front organizations for a globalist plot.

* Financial institutions: Financial gatekeepers, such as bankers and regulators, are viewed as maintaining the stability of capital markets in a way that benefits the elite while hindering the financial interests of the general population.

Summary of the conspiratorial narrative

In short, the globalist conspiracy theory alleges that a powerful elite secretly uses concepts like stakeholder capitalism and figures like George Soros to achieve their goals. Gatekeepers, such as the media and other institutions, are viewed as instruments for spreading their influence, controlling information, and suppressing dissent. This narrative portrays a world where events are not random but part of a coordinated plot toward a totalitarian “New World Order”.

Google AI [how the globalists use stakeholders and gatekeepers]
=====

Stakeholders

The term “stakeholder capitalism” was first introduced by the World Economic in 2005. If you’ve been reading my essays, for awhile, that should not be at all surprising. It is dangerous for a Democratic Republic because it basically replaces citizen representation with stakeholders who represent global -- not local or national -- interests. It represents a serous affront to the sovereignty of nations, states and cities. It is basically the unelected global cabal I referred to in my speech before the City Council.

=====
Everywhere one turns around the United Nations, the word “stakeholder” seems to have displaced “non-governmental organizations”, “civil society organizations”, “constituencies”, “communities”, and even “citizens”. More recently the UN Secretary-General advocated in an influential report called “Our Common Agenda” that the future of multilateralism should strongly rely on multistakeholderism. His language even sometimes merges multistakeholderism and multilateralism together into what he calls “UN 2.0”. This should raise alarm as the concept has serious democratic limitations.

Origins in gambling and the business world

The origin of the stakeholder as a term of art is from the world of gambling. Two people bet on an outcome and, as neither fully trusts the other, they hand over their stakes in the gamble to a “stakeholder”. Subsequently the term was coopted into management speak. Corporate advisors were telling boards of directors and executives that they should broaden their horizons from “shareholders” to encompass stockowners, workers and customers which they called in aggregate corporate “stakeholders”. This approach was moved to the broader economic frame by the World Economic Forum which in 2005 introduced the concept of “stakeholder capitalism”.

Neither stakeholder nor multi-stakeholder governance are compatible with democracy

In none of these contexts, democracy plays a central role.

In fact, neither “stakeholder” governance nor “multistakeholder” governance are compatible with democracy. In what we shall call multistakeholderism or Msism in short, one or more of the founding members of a given stakeholder group select the key members, one or more of which are from the corporate community. “Stakeholder” governance thus is an introductory linguistic step toward legitimating “multistakeholder” governance without any central role for democratic representation.

Proponents of multistakeholderism do present a number of claims about its democratic nature. They say that it brings into decision-making more than governments because governments are not really representative of the public; it provides a formal seat at the table for different “stakeholders” granting them a role in governing a particular topic; it builds upon the idea of “public-private partnerships” where all levels of government, community organizations and corporations are said to work together well at delivering public services. What is side stepped by these claims is that the participants are self-selected and hand-picked. Further, corporate stakeholders usually have a disproportionate power inside a multistakeholder group from the very beginning.

The UN’s stakeholder approach is dangerous for democracy (04/13/2023)
https://www.democracywithoutborders.org/27333/the-uns-stakeholder-approach-is-dangerous-for-democracy/#
=====

Gatekeepers

Gatekeepers are individuals or organizations that control access to information, resources, and influence to maintain the status quo and serve the global elite’s interests. Their primary role is to silence the dissenting voices of the growing Anti-Globalist Movement. The Gatekeepers include Globalist Corporate Media (MSNBC, CNN, FOX), Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube etc.), Academia and Financial Institutions. Gatekeepers more recently include governments and legislatures who are now pushing the “Kids Online Safety Act” (KOSA) in the United States and the “Online Safety Act” in Great Britain. While their main argument is to protect children from accessing porn the real intent is to require a digital ID to access the internet. After all the only way to achieve this goal is to require everyone -- young and old -- to have a digital ID.

Just the other day, Internet Gatekeeper, Google admitted they were coerced by the Biden Administration to censor online content regarding immigration, the Plandemic etc. And as much as I admire Matt Taibbi he is dead wrong to say internet censorship is on the decline.

=====
Google this week sent a letter to the House Judiciary Committee:

“Senior Biden administration officials, including White House officials, conducted, repeated and sustained outreach to Alphabet and pressed the company regarding certain user-generated content related to the COVID-19 pandemic that did not violate its policies.

While the company continued to develop and enforce its policies independently, Biden administration officials continued to press the company to remove non-violative user generated content as online platforms, including Alphabet grappled. With these decisions, the administration’s officials, including President Biden, created a political atmosphere that sought to influence the actions of platforms based on their concerns regarding misinformation.

It is unacceptable and wrong when any government, including the Biden administration, attempts to dictate how the company moderates content, and the company has consistently fought against those efforts on First Amendment grounds.”

Along with the Twitter Files and Mark Zuckerberg’s admission about Biden officials who would “scream” or “curse” about removing content, the Google letter caps the trifecta of major Internet platforms who’ve admitted to partnering with the government in systematic censorship in the pre-Trump period.

YouTube removed thousands of people from its platform at the government’s behest during the pandemic. Tens of thousands more were deamplified or labeled, often incorrectly. Even before letters like the one above, this was no secret. When reporters like me called to ask YouTube, Meta, or Twitter why this or that person had been sanctioned during the pandemic, they told us flat-out they were following parameters laid out by government. Google announced this publicly, in statements like:

Prevention misinformation: We do not allow content that promotes information that contradicts health authority guidance on the prevention or transmission of specific health conditions, or on the safety, efficacy or ingredients of currently approved and administered vaccines.

Google, Facebook, and Twitter didn’t just suppress information that contradicted “health authority guidance,” information which incidentally was often true (as in the cases of people like Jay Bhattacharya, Alex Berenson, and Harvard’s Martin Kulldorff). They made conscious decisions to leave up government misinformation. While YouTube was removing critics of the vaccine, it was leaving up a CNN Town Hall featuring President Biden saying that if you get the shot, “you’re not going to die”:

Before this year there were entire federal bureaucracies devoted to policing speech, from the State Department’s Global Engagement Center to the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force to the White House Office of Digital Strategy. State agencies also partnered with “private” NGOs (often, funded by government) to create secondary bureaucracies charged with policing speech, like the now-defunct Stanford Internet Observatory, which denied making content recommendations until forced to turn over documents showing they did just that. The FBI and Department of Homeland Security were having monthly (in some cases weekly) meetings with upwards of two dozen Internet companies, funneling “guidance” on content on a range of topics, from Covid to Russia to Iran to “U.S. Elections.” Like a parolee, Facebook had to send a “bi-weekly Covid content report” to Surgeon General Vivek Murthy.

Whether you blame this on the administration of Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or the first term of Donald Trump (during which some of these bodies flourished), it’s now undeniable that federal pressure or “jawboning” to suppress dissent was systematic long before Jimmy Kimmel got a few days off.

How did politicians and the U.S. media respond to confirmation that the last administration engaged in wholesale censorship not of one jerkwad talk show host, but the entire world? They pretended it didn’t happen.

No, Things Aren’t Worse Now on Speech. It’s Not Even Close
As Google becomes the latest company to admit to mass censorship, the mania over Jimmy Kimmel has morphed into a grotesque propaganda campaign
Matt Taibbi Sep 25, 2025

No, Things Aren't Worse Now on Speech. It's Not Even Close

=====

As I explain in the following essay internet censorship is not declining, they are merely changing their methods. For years I distributed my essays through Facebook, relying on texting to dozens of Facebook groups each day. Using this approach I would ussually get about 1,500 reads within a week. Now I can only text to 4 groups per day and I’m lucky if I can garner 1,000 reads.

=====
Facebook continues to censor Anti-Globalist Speech during Trump Administration
Facebooks new censorship tactics a major setback to the growing Anti-Globalist movement
Bruce Cain Jun 24, 2025

=====

The ultimate globalist goal is Digital ID and Digital Currency

As I mentioned in my City Council speech “perhaps the most dangerous globalist policy humanity has ever faced is the current introduction of a digital ID and Digital currency now being pushed by Trump and countries throughout the planet.” I have been warning about the dangers of a Cashless Society since at least 2022. In essence a Digital Currency is the Mark of the Beast: a mark you must have in order to buy or sell anything.

=====
The Global Quickening: The Escalating Clusterfuck of humanity by the Globalists
Why our primary goal must be a worldwide movement against Digital Currency
Bruce Cain Nov 30, 2022

=====

Just the other day Great Britain’s Starmer announced that every citizen will soon have to have a digital ID.

“Let me spell that out. You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have Digital ID. It’s as simple as that.”

=====
Keir Starmer savagely blasted over Digital ID rollout (09/25/2025)

=====

=====
‘Danger To Freedom And Privacy’ | Keir Starmer Announces I.D. Cards In Britain (09/25/2025)

=====

=====
UK says it will introduce digital ID cards, reigniting a contentious idea • FRANCE 24 English (09/27/2025)

=====

He is trying to sell the idea by saying it will help stop Illegal Immigration into the UK. But Iain Davis, explains in great detail, why that is simply untrue.

=====
The BritCard Digital ID Psyop
Iain Davis Sep 27, 2025

The BritCard Digital ID Psyop

=====

Meanwhile Trump is pushing for a Digital Currency in the United States which will require a Digital ID and may be used as a “pump and dump” on the American People. In other words a digital currency could well result in further debasement of the US dollar. Sorry Trump but the American People can not shoulder any further economic hardship.

In the following essay, and video link, Greg Reese suggests that Trump may well use the Genius Act to erase our 37 Trillion dollar debt by shifting the burden to the American working class. Trump and Biden have already devalued our money by 20% by creating some 7 Trillion dollars, out of thin air, during the Plandemic (2020-2023). The American People, and people throughout the world, have already been bled dry by these unnecessary policies. As Gregg Reese suggests “the US is planning a worldwide crypto rug pull to erase its massive debt by creating a US debt based stable-coin system, and then devalue it, robbing the people of their money to pay off it’s debt.” Any further burden must be shouldered by the ultra rich. If Trump actually does this I am almost certain it will set off a Civil War. This would be the greatest act of treachery in the history of the United States and would negate everything he has done as president. I will obviously writing more on this subject in the future. But we cannot allow the Globalist Corporate Media to insulate Trump from explaining his plans to the American People. Even as things currently stand an ever growing percent of Americans can no longer keep up with the inflation.

=====
While Charlie Kirk’s death is being used by political agents to attack freedom of speech and to further divide an already divided nation, many are wondering, what happens next. And most financial analysts these days will tell you what’s next, radical change in the US economy is coming. The U.S. government is facing a criminally irresponsible debt crisis. The world is losing faith in the dollar and growing more and more disgusted with the crimes against humanity that the USD money printing machines are funding every day. Cutting spending didn’t work. And the next attempt to try and save the US debt based system can be found in the recent, “Genius Act.”

In short term investing, the volatility of Bitcoin can allow a person to profit immensely, but only if they have a stable-coin to convert to when the market corrects itself. This is the foundational purpose of a stable-coin, to maintain a stable value so that one’s investment can be temporarily secured. The plan outlined in the Genius act is to create an increased demand for US debt by requiring stable-coin companies to be backed by U.S. debt, thereby using stable-coins as a way to funnel global money into U.S. government debt. President Putin’s adviser, Anton Kobyakov, says that the US is planning a worldwide crypto rug pull to erase its massive debt by creating a US debt based stable-coin system, and then devalue it, robbing the people of their money to pay off it’s debt. Of course this is all just money out of thin air. A desperate “monetary sleight-of-hand” that doesn’t create any new wealth, and only shows that the system has failed. To show that Russia and other countries will not go along with this, he also said that the world will split up into zones. This is referring to a multi-polar world where different sets of rules are applied to different zones, and signals the strong possibility that BRICS will not be buying US debt in the near future. It is important to remember that the term and the idea of BRICS was conceived in 2001 by an economist at Goldman Sachs. U.S. regulations on stable-coins will likely push the market offshore where stable-coin issuers will turn to Real World Assets over US debt. The US will then have to manage the debt crisis by taxing the American people, most likely, with a carbon tax system. Stable-coins have been predominantly used for investing, but they also have the ability to freeze and seize your money. Which should please Trump supporters who have been giddy school girls over canceling people who offend them online. The future of technocratic banking control is already being deployed in Vietnam, who recently implemented a nationwide digital ID system that requires both citizens and foreign residents to permit the government to store their biometric data in a centralized database. Participation is not optional, and all accounts without biometric data will be closed to prevent scams and fraud. The Vietnamese government has already erased and/or frozen 86 million bank accounts. And Vietnam is just the beta test, this is going worldwide.

What the GENIUS ACT Will Soon Bring
Greg Reese Sep 17, 2025

What the GENIUS ACT Will Soon Bring

=====

Concluding remarks

I just monetized my Substack blog the other day. So if you value my essays and can afford it please consider a paid subscription. I have no short term plans to restrict access to my essays.

The push toward a Globalist Dystopia continues to accelerate as more and more globalist agendas are being rolled out both globally and at the same time. I do encourage citizens to oppose the Globalist Agenda through their City Councils realizing they can only address issues that directly effect their cities. You can’t address the dangers of Digital ID and Digital Currencies at your local City Council. But you can share my essays to help raise consciousness among your friends, families and through internet social media. I also think we will have to begin organizing local/state/national teachins and demonstrations to stop this Globalist Agenda from relegating every human to the status of a slave on a Globalist Plantation.