You mention "the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie". You may want to have a read of the this recent article published in the journal, Nature Medicine.
"The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable"
"This research has created undue confidence in the use of ivermectin as a prophylactic or treatment for COVID-19, has usurped other research agendas, and probably resulted in inappropriate treatment or substandard care of patients."
First of all philosophically I believe in "free choice" regardless of what our institutions allow or dictate. And I'm pretty consistent on that point: Cannabis, Vaccines, Abortion, Psilocybin should all be a matter of personal choice. The same institutions -- the UN as an example -- are pushing all sorts of "false narrative." For decades they were against the legalization of Cannabis because they say it a threat to Big Pharma (e.g., Cannabis turns out to be an effective medicine but still not one of the UN's "essential medicines." Today they are pushing anthropogenic climate change -- man made climate change -- in order to push the Climate Change agenda. And yet there is no anthropogenic climate change. Today they are pushing forced vaccinations and vaccine passports in order to control every human on the planet. At the end of the day the UN agenda (Agenda21, Agenda2030) are not about improving the lives of the individual but rather imposing a Global Government which will relegate us to slaves on a Global Plantation.
As for the Nature article. It is just one analysis and seems to ignore the data in India which shows the outpatient administration of the Ivermectin Protocol has resulted in a significant reduction in Covid related fatalities.
I also worked for a Peer Review organization which reviewed "best practices" when it came to breast cancer, childhood immunizations etc.
In any case I believe in the right of the individual to choose -- regardless of whether it works or not. And the fact is our institutions have been wrong about so many things: cigarettes, thalidomide, Cannabis, Psilocybin, DDT, Lead/Arsenic, over vaccination of children.
But I do think it clear the the Ivermectin Protocol is a better approach to this Covid-19 virus (bioweapon) than the mRNA injection. And I support this protocol along with any other modalities (Intravenous Vit. C, Monoclonal Antibodies etc). If it is administered early through outpatient prescription there is no need for the mRNA injection which as already killed over 14,000 US Citizens according to the VAERs database. It should also be recognized that the VAERs database only reports 1-10% of cases so the real number of deaths, from the injection, are probably between 140,000 to 1,400,000 deaths. And that is just in the US.
If you've read my recent essays it is pretty clear that the goal of the UN, WEF, WHO is to use the virus to push forced vaccinations and vaccine passports. The goal is global control of everything and everyone. That is why they attacked all non-vaccine alternatives. Because if these other modalities prove effective there is no longer a legitimate reason to allow the mRNA vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization. And that will end both forced vaccination and vaccine passports -- which is their real goal. And that is exactly why they characterized both Ivermectin as "Horse Medicine" and Hydrochloriquine as ineffective: they both expose the Achilles Heal behind their plan.
But despite all the efforts of Globalist Corporate Media -- to suppress the information -- the horse is already out of the barn. The people don't trust our institutions which explains why so many are trying to get access to Ivermectin and other non-vaccine alternatives. As I said I think this Plandemic will eventually be seen as one of the greatest crimes of the early 21st century.
Here are some of my additional thoughts along with a few additional articles. I have seen many videos -- including the interview of a nurse by Project Veritas -- that make clear our medical institutions are suppressing the harm done by the vaccine. Again this is a crime.
=====
The Role of IVERMECTIN in the Monumental decline of COVID19 Cases in INDIA
Your religion is what you, individually, believe. Employers have no right to demand you don't use Preparation H in order to get a religious exemption. They can stick that straight up their butts. We can not allow this new form of global fascism: our bodies, our choice. No intermediary has a right to question our personal beliefs: no litmus test should EVER be required.
This is no different than the hearsay and blasphemy ideology crap the Vatican used to employ to enforce it's ideology under what was a Theocracy. You see the same thing today in Afghanistan where the ideology is Medieval Sharia Law: which reduces women to the status of chattel. What we are seeing is a rise of a secular ideology (e.g., globalism, collectivism) utilizing the very same tactics:
* Labeling those that will not submit, to a globalist government (e.g., The Great Reset), as heretics.
* Labeling very prominent virologists, who are calling for an end to the mRNA injections, blasphemers for questioning the Plandemic ideology. And those pushing the forced vaccination/vaccine passport agenda have not the "courage of their convictions:" they simply ignore what these highly qualified scientists are trying to warn us about.
Technocrat Strategies Emerge To Block Religious Exemptions For Vaccines (09/17/2021)
linkedin.com/pulse/role-ivermectin-monumental-decline-covid19-cases-vicente-md/?
You mention "the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie". You may want to have a read of the this recent article published in the journal, Nature Medicine.
"The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01535-y
From your Nature article:
"This research has created undue confidence in the use of ivermectin as a prophylactic or treatment for COVID-19, has usurped other research agendas, and probably resulted in inappropriate treatment or substandard care of patients."
First of all philosophically I believe in "free choice" regardless of what our institutions allow or dictate. And I'm pretty consistent on that point: Cannabis, Vaccines, Abortion, Psilocybin should all be a matter of personal choice. The same institutions -- the UN as an example -- are pushing all sorts of "false narrative." For decades they were against the legalization of Cannabis because they say it a threat to Big Pharma (e.g., Cannabis turns out to be an effective medicine but still not one of the UN's "essential medicines." Today they are pushing anthropogenic climate change -- man made climate change -- in order to push the Climate Change agenda. And yet there is no anthropogenic climate change. Today they are pushing forced vaccinations and vaccine passports in order to control every human on the planet. At the end of the day the UN agenda (Agenda21, Agenda2030) are not about improving the lives of the individual but rather imposing a Global Government which will relegate us to slaves on a Global Plantation.
As for the Nature article. It is just one analysis and seems to ignore the data in India which shows the outpatient administration of the Ivermectin Protocol has resulted in a significant reduction in Covid related fatalities.
http://linkedin.com/pulse/role-ivermectin-monumental-decline-covid19-cases-vicente-md/
I also worked for a Peer Review organization which reviewed "best practices" when it came to breast cancer, childhood immunizations etc.
In any case I believe in the right of the individual to choose -- regardless of whether it works or not. And the fact is our institutions have been wrong about so many things: cigarettes, thalidomide, Cannabis, Psilocybin, DDT, Lead/Arsenic, over vaccination of children.
But I do think it clear the the Ivermectin Protocol is a better approach to this Covid-19 virus (bioweapon) than the mRNA injection. And I support this protocol along with any other modalities (Intravenous Vit. C, Monoclonal Antibodies etc). If it is administered early through outpatient prescription there is no need for the mRNA injection which as already killed over 14,000 US Citizens according to the VAERs database. It should also be recognized that the VAERs database only reports 1-10% of cases so the real number of deaths, from the injection, are probably between 140,000 to 1,400,000 deaths. And that is just in the US.
If you've read my recent essays it is pretty clear that the goal of the UN, WEF, WHO is to use the virus to push forced vaccinations and vaccine passports. The goal is global control of everything and everyone. That is why they attacked all non-vaccine alternatives. Because if these other modalities prove effective there is no longer a legitimate reason to allow the mRNA vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization. And that will end both forced vaccination and vaccine passports -- which is their real goal. And that is exactly why they characterized both Ivermectin as "Horse Medicine" and Hydrochloriquine as ineffective: they both expose the Achilles Heal behind their plan.
But despite all the efforts of Globalist Corporate Media -- to suppress the information -- the horse is already out of the barn. The people don't trust our institutions which explains why so many are trying to get access to Ivermectin and other non-vaccine alternatives. As I said I think this Plandemic will eventually be seen as one of the greatest crimes of the early 21st century.
We buy all the Ivermectin we need OTC in Mexico. No prescription needed. 4 tabs of 6 mg each costs $ 62 pesos. Tax included. De nada.
Here are some of my additional thoughts along with a few additional articles. I have seen many videos -- including the interview of a nurse by Project Veritas -- that make clear our medical institutions are suppressing the harm done by the vaccine. Again this is a crime.
=====
The Role of IVERMECTIN in the Monumental decline of COVID19 Cases in INDIA
Published on June 5, 2021
linkedin.com/pulse/role-ivermectin-monumental-decline-covid19-cases-vicente-md/?
=====
Your religion is what you, individually, believe. Employers have no right to demand you don't use Preparation H in order to get a religious exemption. They can stick that straight up their butts. We can not allow this new form of global fascism: our bodies, our choice. No intermediary has a right to question our personal beliefs: no litmus test should EVER be required.
This is no different than the hearsay and blasphemy ideology crap the Vatican used to employ to enforce it's ideology under what was a Theocracy. You see the same thing today in Afghanistan where the ideology is Medieval Sharia Law: which reduces women to the status of chattel. What we are seeing is a rise of a secular ideology (e.g., globalism, collectivism) utilizing the very same tactics:
* Labeling those that will not submit, to a globalist government (e.g., The Great Reset), as heretics.
* Labeling very prominent virologists, who are calling for an end to the mRNA injections, blasphemers for questioning the Plandemic ideology. And those pushing the forced vaccination/vaccine passport agenda have not the "courage of their convictions:" they simply ignore what these highly qualified scientists are trying to warn us about.
Technocrat Strategies Emerge To Block Religious Exemptions For Vaccines (09/17/2021)
https://www.technocracy.news/technocrat-strategies-emerge-to-block-religious-exemptions-for-vaccines/
=====
Nurse at Health and Human Services Hospital Reveals CoverUp of Vaccine Injuries
September 22, 2021
needtoknow.news/2021/09/nurse-at-health-and-human-services-hospital-reveals-coverup-of-vaccine-injuries/?