Will Trump’s push for Data Centers lead to Digital Global Enslavement -- Part 2

Trumps push for Data Centers, a Cashless Society and the Mark of the Beast

Summary

Trumps push for massive AI Data Centers is problematic for so many reasons, which is why I am writing a series of essays on the subject. But I have yet to find a single article addressing the fact that these Data Centers will be used for ushering in Digital ID, Digital Currency and ultimately a Cashless Society where we become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Digital Plantation. Maintaining the real time management of Digital Wallets, in a Cashless Society, will require the collection of huge amounts of data. And as this system comes into place Trumps plan is to pay off the 39 Trillion Federal Deficit by further debasing the value of the dollar. As his Big Tech Cronies get richer the working class will be forced to pay the price through hyperinflation and increasingly worthless dollars.

Neither President Trump or Globalist Corporate Media have said a single word about one of the primary things these Data Centers will be used for: maintaining all of the Blockchain data required to support a Cashless Society. The reason is obvious: over 80 percent of Americans are opposed to a Cashless Society. Over 70 percent of the American People are opposed to the Data Centers. Admitting that these Data Centers will be the digital backbone for a Cashless Society would cause major outrage from the American People. And that is why they won’t discuss the topic.

I voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024. And for all the good he has done -- closing the southern border; ending LGBTQ curriculums, ESG, DEI; liberating Iran etc. -- he may be remembered as a Jungian archetype of the Anti-Christ for ushering in the “Mark of the Beast” system: digital currency, digital ID and a Cashless Society.

And just as Political Islam is incompatible with the US Constitution and Western values a Cashless Society is also incompatible with our US Constitution and our inalienable rights. Both Political Islam and a Cashless Society constitute existential threats to individual freedom. Both must be eradicated.

I say this because, if Trump pushes toward a Cashless Society the government will have unprecedented power over the people. He will be remembered as a traitor to the American People, committing the ultimate sin: treachery. In a Cashless Society we will become nothing more than slaves on a Globalist Plantation And I believe he is perfectly aware of this.

It is becoming increasingly obvious one of the purposes of Trump’s Data Centers is to usher in a Cashless Society where your Digital ID will be linked to your Blockchain Digital Wallet. Both Trump and Globalist Corporate Media (MSNOW, CNN, FOX etc.) purposely avoid the subject because this would surely create even more backlash to the proliferation of Data Centers. After all over 80% of Americans are opposed to a fully cashless society. Instead Trump and Globalist Corporate Media want the public to remain distracted and clueless until they are ready to flip the switch. So while you may see news segments on public opposition, to AI Data Centers -- really AI Surveillance Centers -- you’ll never hear them admit that these Data Centers will be used to usher in a Cashless Society and a whole lot of additionally dystopian control. Both Trump and Globalist Corporate Media are essentially leading us like sheep to the slaughter.

=====
Over 80% of Americans oppose a fully cashless society, while public opinion on digital IDs is divided depending on their specific implementation and purpose.

The movement of cash vs. digital infrastructure represents a major financial debate for consumers.

Cashless Society

Widespread polling reveals a deep-seated resistance to phasing out physical currency, driven by concerns over privacy, technological exclusion, and financial independence.

* General Opposition: Recent national research conducted by the Siena Research Institute and the Payment Choice Coalition shows that 84% of Americans oppose the U.S. becoming a cashless society.

* Support for Cash Mandates: Over 85% of Americans support legislation requiring retail businesses to accept cash so that physical currency remains a universally accessible option.

* Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC): Public hesitancy is highly pronounced regarding government-backed digital currencies. Polls from the Cato Institute reveal that 68% of Americans oppose a CBDC if it allows the government to monitor what people buy, with nearly 76% citing general risks as outweighing the potential benefits.

Digital IDs

Opposition to digital ID systems (such as linking state IDs or driver’s licenses to mobile phones) is complex. Opposition is generally not universal, but rather depends heavily on concerns regarding government overreach, hacking vulnerabilities, and tracking.

* Security & Fraud: There is strong bipartisan support for certain digital ID formats (like Real ID) designed to combat online fraud and verify user identity.

* Privacy Risks: Despite some support for anti-fraud digital IDs, many consumer privacy groups and a significant portion of the public oppose relying strictly on mobile IDs or vaccine-style digital passports. The primary resistance centers on fears of a unified “social credit” tracking system, data centralization, and the loss of anonymity.

Google AI [poll Americans opposed to digital id and a cashless society]
=====

=====
Poll: Only 16% of Americans Support the Government Issuing a Central Bank Digital Currency (05/31/2023)
https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/poll-only-16-americans-support-government-issuing-central-bank-digital-currency
=====

Over 70 percent of Americans oppose the construction of AI Data Centers.

=====
An overwhelming majority of Americans oppose the construction of artificial intelligence data centers in their local communities, according to a Gallup survey. Only a small fraction support the projects, and data center developments face even higher local resistance than nuclear power plants.

Key Poll Findings

* Total Opposition: 71% of U.S. adults oppose building AI data centers in their local area (23% somewhat oppose, 48% strongly oppose).

* Total Support: Only 27% favor construction (20% somewhat favor, 7% strongly favor).

* Nuclear Comparison: In the same survey, 53% opposed having a nuclear energy plant in their area—meaning Americans are nearly 20% more likely to object to a local data center than a nuclear facility.

Demographic Breakdown

* Gender: While both men and women overwhelmingly oppose data centers, women voice stronger disapproval (55% of women strongly oppose compared to 43% of men). Men are slightly more likely to favor them for their potential economic benefits.

Reasons for Opposition

Those who oppose the massive computing facilities cite several primary concerns:

* Resource Consumption: Massive water and energy usage required to cool and power the servers.

* Environmental Impact: Worry about how these enormous buildings will affect the local environment.

* Utility Costs: Fear that the high power demand will drive up local residential electricity bills.The complete results and methodology of this study are available on Gallup News.

Google AI [americans support for data centers gallop poll]
=====

=====
Seven in 10 Americans oppose constructing data centers for artificial intelligence in their local area, including nearly half, 48%, who are strongly opposed. Barely a quarter favor these projects, with 7% strongly in favor.

Americans Oppose AI Data Centers in Their Area (05/13/2026)
https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx
=====

Meanwhile the administration wants to Tokenize all assets which will blur lines of ownership. Once this transition is complete, globally, humans will be nothing more than Slaves on a Global Plantation. Trumps agenda is a violation of our Constitutional Rights and should be seen for what it is: Treason and Treachery against the American People. For the first time in 300,000 years of human history the entire human race can be digitally monitored and controlled.

Trump thinks his MAGA base are clueless idiots

Trump obviously thinks his MAGA base are clueless idiots that are oblivious to his push toward a Cashless Society. Recall when he said, years ago, that he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any voters?

=====

Trump quote I could shoot someone on 5th Ave and not lose any voters

=====

There are 3 primary prerequisites required to implement a cashless society:

1) digital currency,
2) data centers to collect transaction data and
3) digital ID for each citizen.

Why are people opposed to a Digital Currency and a Cashless Society?

For almost a decade Catherine Austin Fitts from Solari, Whitney Webb from the Unlimited Hangout, Patrick Wood from Technocracy News, myself and hundreds of internet commentators have been opposed to a digital currency and a transition to a cashless society. For the 300,000 years of human existence currencies have been fungible and transactions were anonymous. A Cashless Society turns this on its head as all transactions will suddenly be visible to the government. Anonymity will be forever gone. And that will give the government unprecedented control over what we are allowed to do with our money. No way to pay for a prostitute or buy illegal drugs as the informal economy will be no more. If they want to take away your gun rights they simply won’t allow you to purchase a gun or ammunition. And if you don’t comply with the governments demands they will just suspend your access to you Digital Wallet. In short a Cashless Society will usher in a new era Digital Slavery.

A Digital Currency also meets the criteria for the Anti-Christ and the Mark of the Beast in Revelations:

To be clear I’m am a secularist and don’t subscribe to any Abrahamic religious ideology. But I am familiar with the various texts of the Abrahamic religions: Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

In Revelations it is the Anti-Christ who imposes the Mark of the Beast: a mark required to buy or sell anything.

“It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.” Revelations 13: 16-17

It is patently obvious that this “Mark of the Beast” perfectly describes a Cashless Society, driven by Digital ID, Digital Currency, and a Cashless Society. In a cashless society everything you buy or sell is monitored and controlled through your Digital Wallet driven by a Blockchain ledger. Since Trump is obviously pushing this agenda that would make him a Jungian archetype of an Anti-Christ. After all Revelations makes clear it is the Anti-Christ who imposes this Mark of the Beast system. It also means that he is fulfilling the goals of the UN’s Agenda2030 and the WEF’s Great Reset, where you will own nothing a be very unhappy.

So whether you see Trump as the Anti-Christ, or a Globalist — in disguise, ushering in a New World Order — it should be clear he is committing treason against the American People. I’m not going to sugar coat this.

At the time the Bible was written slaves were often branded with a unique code that identified that they were slaves who owned them. With the adoption of a cashless society every human will have a unique Digital ID and the government will have instant access to oversee every purchase you make. And that is why a cashless society, linked to digital ID, is often called the Beast System.

Here is a summary of the other reasons people oppose a Digital Currency and a Cashless Society:

=====
People are opposed to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) primarily due to severe concerns regarding privacy, financial surveillance, and the potential for government overreach.

The main arguments against CBDCs include:

* Loss of Privacy: Unlike cash, digital transactions can be monitored, tracked, and recorded by the government, eliminating financial anonymity.

* Financial Surveillance & Control: Critics fear central authorities could restrict how, where, or when money is spent (e.g., blocking purchases of certain goods or implementing programmable expiration dates on funds).

* Risk to Commercial Banks: Widespread adoption of CBDCs could draw deposits away from private banks, potentially destabilizing the traditional banking sector and reducing credit availability.

* Exclusion of the Unbanked: Vulnerable populations without reliable internet access, technological literacy, or bank accounts could be financially marginalized.

* Cybersecurity Threats: Centralized digital currency systems create massive databases that could become high-value targets for hackers and foreign adversaries.

* Censorship: Governments could theoretically freeze or seize the digital assets of individuals without going through traditional legal processes.

Google AI [what are the main reasons people are opposed to a digital currency]
=====

Creating a Digital Currency: Trumps great Bait and Switch

In January 2025 Trump issued an executive order banning the introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). At the time his MAGA base was relieved because they were opposed to a digital currency and believed that his rejection of a CBDC also meant a rejection of a digital currency and a Cashless Society. Then in July 2025 he legitimized the introduction of Stablecoins, through the Genius Act, which is equally problematic. This was an obvious “bait and switch” on Trumps part. Both can be used to usher in a Centrally Controlled Cashless Society using blockchain technology.

Way back in 2017 I wrote and essay titled “The End of Cash and the Beginning of a Demonic Global “New World Order.” Even back 9 years ago they were talking about a transition to a cashless society utilizing what they called Fedcoin. Fedcoin was based on the same technology as Bitcoin, CBDCs and Stablecoin: blockchain. Blockchain technology basically creates a ledger (e.g., spreadsheet) for each individual. Unlike traditional cash transactions, which maintain anonymity, every purchase you make through a blockchain digital currency is visible to the government in real time.

Let’s unpack this. In the following video Matt says the following.

“July 18th, 2025, United States. The president signs a piece of legislation called the GENESIS Act into law. The bill creates the first federal rulebook for something called a stablecoin, a digital dollar that lives on a blockchain instead of in a bank account. One token equals one real dollar backed by reserves, redeemable anytime. Banks use them. Wall Street uses them. Hundreds of billions of dollars already move through them every week. They look like dollars, they spend like dollars, and increasingly, they are the dollars moving through the American financial system. Here’s the part nobody on cable news read. Buried in section 4A is a requirement that every stablecoin issuer in this country must possess the technical capability to seize, freeze, or burn those digital dollars on a court order. And the freeze button is already in use. Tether, the biggest stablecoin issuer on Earth, bigger than most American banks, has frozen 4.2 billion dollars in tokens to date. Circle, the second biggest, froze 16 unrelated businesses last month on a sealed civil case nobody was allowed to read. Seizing is programmed. [clears throat] Freezing is programmed. Burning is programmed. Expiring is next. And if you’re up to date on this story, you may be thinking, Matt, didn’t Trump ban the digital dollar last January, like last year January? Aren’t we supposed to be safe from all of this? That is exactly the first question we have to answer, because the timeline doesn’t add up.”

=====
A senior World Bank advisor published the blueprint for “expiring money” — programmable currency that can be frozen, deducted, or set to lose value on a date the issuer picks. Here’s what the GENIUS Act, BlackRock’s tokenization roadmap, and one sealed federal court case reveal about the future of asset protection, monetary policy, and your financial security. This is the documentation, the legislation, and the on-the-record quotes — so you can decide for yourself. In this video, we walk through exactly what the World Bank wrote and when, the gap between the January 2025 executive order and the law signed six months later, the freezes that have already happened on private payment rails, and what the CEO of the world’s largest asset manager has said publicly about tokenizing every asset class — including the deed to your home. This is a financial survival breakdown for the responsible American homeowner — the saver, the retiree, the household that played by the rules and wants to understand where monetary policy, digital currency regulation, and asset protection are actually headed. Plain English. Receipts included. You make the call.

They’re Quietly Putting an Expiration Date on YOUR Money (It’s Begun) (05/22/2026)

=====

Yep, as Mark states, on January 23, 2025 Trump banned the establishment of a CBDC, a form of Digital Currency. This led many Trump supporters to believe this signaled a rejection of a Digital Currency and a Cashless Society.

=====
Sec. 5. Prohibition of Central Bank Digital Currencies.

(a) Except to the extent required by law, agencies are hereby prohibited from undertaking any action to establish, issue, or promote CBDCs within the jurisdiction of the United States or abroad.

(b) Except to the extent required by law, any ongoing plans or initiatives at any agency related to the creation of a CBDC within the jurisdiction of the United States shall be immediately terminated, and no further actions may be taken to develop or implement such plans or initiatives.

STRENGTHENING AMERICAN LEADERSHIP IN DIGITAL FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY
The White House January 23, 2025
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/strengthening-american-leadership-in-digital-financial-technology/
=====

But then on July 18th, 2025 Trump signs the Genius Act into law which allows the establishment of a Digital Currency based on Stablecoin. I say this is a “bait and switch” because both a CBDC and Stablecoin both pave the way toward a Digital Currency, a Digital Wallet and a Cashless Society. Trump obviously thinks the American people are clueless idiots.

The Genius Act

If you really want to understand the dangers of the Genius Act please read my extensive essay.

=====
On July 18, 2025, President Trump signed the Genius Act after it was passed with bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. I found it surreal how little coverage Globalist Corporate Media gave the Genius Act both before and after Trump signed it into law. It is almost like they didn’t want the public to consider what a digital dollar, and the underlying block chain technology, could mean for individual privacy, government control and the value of the dollar. And of course no one challenged Trump when he said he issued an Executive Order to ban CBDC’s (January 2025) while failing to acknowledge that Stablecoins are functionally equivalent to CBDC’s and present that same problems: including the potential to establish a social credit system similar to what is already occurring in China.

Trump’s Genius Act moves us toward a Dystopian Chinese Credit and Control System
The Stablecoin Digital Currency will bring about the Globalist Great Reset
Bruce Cain Jul 23, 2025

=====

Mark then discusses the Genius Act that allows Stablecoins as a form of digital currency. As I’ve said both CBDCs and Stablecoin are equally dangerous when it comes to ushering in a Beast System of digital currency and surveillance. As he puts it “The digital dollar didn’t die. It took off the government uniform. It put on a Circle hoodie, and it walked back through the front door while everyone was still high-fiving about the executive order.”

“A retiree in the Luohu District of Shenzhen opens an app on her phone. There’s 200 digital yuan sitting in a new wallet, about 30 bucks. There’s a countdown clock on the screen. 6 days. She walks to the corner market, buys groceries, watches the balance drop. Some of her neighbors don’t move fast enough. On October 19th, 3,000 of them watch their wallet reset to zero. The yuan didn’t get spent. It got canceled. 8.76 million yuan moved through that district in 6 days. Pilot complete. 2 years later, the World Bank wrote the working paper. That’s the manual. That’s the prototype. And every American who thinks that can’t happen here is one piece of legislation away from being wrong. The piece they’re hiding right between the executive order you remember and the headlines you don’t. So, January 23rd, 2025, Trump signs Executive Order 14178. The order prohibits any federal agency from undertaking, direct quote, “any action to establish, issue, or promote a central bank digital currency.” Done.

Buried. Headlines for 2 days. Then cable news moved on. You went back to your morning coffee feeling pretty good about American common sense. July 18th, 2025, 6 months later, same president, same desk, different pen. He signs the Genius Act into law, public law. Passed the Senate 68 to 30. Passed the House 308 to 121. The bill creates the first-ever federal regulatory framework for private stablecoins. The press coverage called it a crypto win. Most people stopped reading right there. Crypto win. A beautifully crafted anesthetic. Tell the public it’s about those weird internet nerds making imaginary coins and nobody will notice you just legalized the infrastructure to freeze their 401k. But I noticed. It’s a Friday morning in July. A staffer drops the Genius Act text on a clerk’s desk for the president’s signature. 246 pages. Somewhere on page 30-something, Section 4A, buried in the technical compliance language, there’s a requirement that every stablecoin issuer in this country must possess the technical capability to seize, freeze, or burn payment stablecoins when legally required and must comply with lawful orders to do so. Seize, freeze, or burn. It sounds less like a financial regulatory framework and more like the tagline for a particularly aggressive pest control company. But, they didn’t write it for termites. They wrote it for your digital wallet. The pen moves, the signature lands, and the same freeze and burn capability that scared everyone enough to ban the federal CBDC 6 months earlier just got installed on private rails. The digital dollar didn’t die. It took off the government uniform. It put on a Circle hoodie, and it walked back through the front door while everyone was still high-fiving about the executive order. And look, I’m not telling you Trump pulled a fast one. I’m not telling you Congress is in on some grand plot. I’m telling you what the law actually says when you read it. The intent is for you to decide. The mechanism, it’s in the statute.”

Then Matt points out that the Genius Act legally requires issuers of Stablecoin to “seize, freeze, or burn payment stablecoins when legally required by the government.

“Somewhere on page 30-something, Section 4A, buried in the technical compliance language, there’s a requirement that every stablecoin issuer in this country must possess the technical capability to seize, freeze, or burn payment stablecoins when legally required and must comply with lawful orders to do so. Seize, freeze, or burn.”

Say what?

Tokenization and the end of ownership

Recall how the WEF’s Klaus Schwab, in 2020, talked about a Great Reset “where you will own nothing and by happy?” Well fast forward to May 19, 2026, when Trump issued a directive on “Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks.” Trumps directive aims to push the tokenization of traditional assets and modernize U.S. financial markets.

=====
President Trump’s executive orders, including the May 19, 2026, directive on Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks, aim to push the tokenization of traditional assets and modernize U.S. financial markets. The administration is supporting this shift to streamline capital formation and maintain global competitiveness.

Key Impacts on Asset Tokenization

* Support for Real-World Assets (RWAs): The administration has encouraged frameworks for tokenized equities, real estate, and private equity on public and permissioned blockchains.

* Regulatory Modernization: Regulators have been directed to take a “same assets, same rules” technology-neutral approach, which accelerates institutional entry into the tokenized securities market.

* On-Chain Cash and Stablecoins: The executive orders officially promote lawful USD-backed stablecoins while banning Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), creating a trusted on-chain cash solution for institutional tokenized transactions.

* Mainstream Retirement Integration: Actions taken have paved the way for alternative assets—including tokenized and digital products—to be included in mainstream retirement accounts like 401(k)s.

Current Industry Activity

This pro-innovation push has triggered a wave of institutional adoption. Major traditional finance entities are heavily expanding into tokenization:

* Traditional equities and ETFs are in the process of being adapted for 24/7 tokenized exchange platforms.

* Leading financial institutions are actively launching tokenized funds and exploring tokenized deposits on public and private blockchains.

* The broader Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization market is surging, with billions of dollars in assets migrating to on-chain infrastructure.

Google AI [trump eo to push tokenization of assets]
=====

What I find interesting is that the actual word “tokenization” appears nowhere in Trumps directive on Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks.

=====
President Donald J. Trump Integrates Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks
The White House May 19, 2026
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/05/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-integrates-financial-technology-innovation-into-regulatory-frameworks/
=====

As Patrick Wood explains tokenization debases the meaning of ownership and gives the government new powers to tax and seize your assets. We voted for Trump thinking he was actually going to Make America Great Again. Instead it is increasingly apparent, by his actions, that he is acting like an archetype of a Anti-Christ. He is ushering in the New Globalist World Order by pushing Digital IDs, Digital Currency and ultimately a Cashless Society where you must have the Mark (a Digital ID) in order to buy or sell.

=====
Imagine yourself owning a house. It’s yours. You have the deed. You can live in it, paint the walls, rent it out, sell it to anyone you choose, or give it away. Nobody can change the terms of your ownership after you buy it. The deed is recorded at the county courthouse, and no company or platform operator can alter it without your consent and a judge’s order. That is ownership. Now imagine someone tells you there’s a better way. Instead of holding that deed, your house will be converted into a digital token on a computer network. They call this “tokenization.” The token represents your house — or more precisely, it represents a fraction of your house, because the whole point is to divide the property into thousands or even millions of tiny digital pieces that anyone in the world can buy. You might own the equivalent of one ten-thousandth of a building. They tell you this is exciting because it “democratizes” real estate — now everybody can be an “owner.” But that is a lie. It switches definitions in mid-sentence. Owning a “token” is not the same thing as owning a house.

This is the difference between owning a home and owning tokens. Property rights are protected by law, enforceable in court, and cannot be changed unilaterally by a third party. Platform access is granted by an operator, governed by terms of service, and revocable at any time for any reason the operator defines.

The end-game of tokenization:

* The county courthouse is replaced with a server farm.
* The deed is replaced by a smart contract.
* The owner is replaced by a “user”.
* And the “user” holds his position only as long as the platform operator permits it.

The centuries-old system of ownership has been redesigned so that true ownership — permanent, unconditional, and transferable at will — no longer exists. “Trust us,” they said. “You will be happy.” There have been con men throughout history. They promise one thing and then deliver another. Tokenization is the modern version of the bait-and-switch game.

Tokenization: A Seventh Grade Explanation (05/08/2026)
https://www.technocracy.news/tokenization-a-seventh-grade-explanation/
=====

To better understand the dangers of Tokenization please watch the following videos and read the following articles.

=====
Ownership used to be simple. You held the deed. You were in control. Whether it was a home, a piece of land, a bar of gold, or shares in a company. You held something tangible, protected by legal systems and enforceable rights. But that model is quietly being rewritten. A digital process called tokenization is transforming real assets into programmable code, it is an abstraction of true ownership, separating the appearance of control from the actual power to access or defend an asset.

Tokenization and the End of Direct Ownership: A Quiet Revolution (07/27/2025)

=====
=====
Remember when the World Economic Forum predicted that by 2030, you’ll own nothing and be happy? Tokenization is one of the ways it could happen—by turning real assets into digital tokens and separating you from true ownership. In this video, Lynette Zang breaks down how tokenization works, why big players like BlackRock and JPMorgan are all-in, and how it threatens your control over real wealth. Don’t wait! It’s best that you protect yourself with physical gold and silver now.

Tokenization: ‘Own Nothing, Be Broke!’ (05/17/2026)

=====
=====
Asset tokenization is the process of converting real-world assets—real estate, stocks, bonds, gold, art, and increasingly biometrics, health data, and even human behavior—into programmable digital tokens on a blockchain. These tokens enable fractionalization, turning indivisible assets into tradable “slices” that can be bought, sold, or restricted instantly, 24/7. What begins as a seemingly efficient upgrade to markets is rapidly evolving into the foundational layer for a system where everything—including your body and mind—can be digitized, tracked, and controlled. Proponents sell tokenization as revolutionary progress. Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, has repeatedly called it “the beginning of the tokenization of all assets,” claiming it will democratize access and make markets more efficient. Institutions celebrate faster settlement, lower costs, and fractional ownership that lets ordinary people “invest” in assets previously out of reach. These promises mask a darker reality: the benefits flow primarily to the issuers and custodians—giants like BlackRock—who retain ultimate control over the underlying assets while the public holds revocable tokens. What is marketed as inclusion is, in practice, a mechanism to pull more of life into a gamified, always-on marketplace where participation becomes mandatory and behavior is subtly—or not so subtly—nudged as part of a cybernetic organism.

The Tokenization of Everything, Including You (02/01/2026)
https://www.technocracy.news/the-tokenization-of-everything-including-you/
=====
=====
My co-author and I will continue to hammer on tokenization because it is the monster on the loose, the clear and present danger. It is redefining ownership from the bottom up. Your “sovereign property” will be subverted and turned into “user rights” where “you will own nothing.” In reality, Tokenization of all assets is the biggest heist in the history of the world. ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.

Tokenization: The Two Rail Trap (05/22/2026)
https://www.technocracy.news/tokenization-the-two-rail-trap/
=====

Trump, the Mar-a-Lago Accords and the bankrupting of the American People

The Mar-a-Lago accords are based on Miran’s central thesis that persistent U.S. trade imbalances are rooted in the structural overvaluation of the U.S. dollar, driven by global demand for reserve assets. The remedy lies in a downward adjustment of the dollar to a “fairer” value, which he argues “can be redressed by tariffs”. The reason your Taco Bell Mexican Pizza went up from $2 in 2020 to $6.20 today is due to the debasement of the US Dollar. During the Plandemic Trump and Biden printed over 7 trillion dollars which devalued the dollar by nearly 20 percent. Of course Trump takes absolutely no credit for this and Globalist Corporate Media never points out that Trumps policies, in his first term, robbed the American People Blind.

This Mar-a-Lago strategy to downwardly adjust the dollar is only going to make things worse for the American Worker, already suffering from affordability issues.

=====
The first 100 days of the new administration have flirted with, or outright introduced, many unconventional economic policies. These range from a historic global jump in tariffs, to notions of returning to the gold standard, to even a reprised version of the Plaza Accords monikered the Mar-a-Lago Accord. The latter proposes a fundamental shift in global financial markets and international trade, attempting to retrofit economic theory onto Trump’s tariff-first trade agenda. At its core is the flawed premise that U.S. trade deficits are driven by foreign demand for reserve assets – an idea with little validation in real-world capital flow dynamics. Markets are already responding to the U.S. withdrawal from international economic engagement and trade integration. Layered on top of this confidence shift, the framework would risk further undermining trust in U.S. risk-free assets. Even if unofficial, these proposals carry market consequences. If executed, especially through measures like selective default, they could trigger a credibility shock that severely damages the U.S.’s standing as a financial safe haven.

What is the Mar-a-Lago Accord?

The idea drew inspiration from the 1985 Plaza Accord, with the term referencing both a historical analogy and a symbolic location: Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club, which he acquired the same year that the Plaza Accord was signed.

This term was coined by the now Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors Stephen Miran in an essay titled “A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System” that he wrote before he was part of the Trump administration. While it does not serve as an official policy blueprint, it likely functions as a strategic framework or guiding document for how to shape the global trade and financial order.

Miran’s central thesis is that persistent U.S. trade imbalances are rooted in the structural overvaluation of the U.S. dollar, driven by global demand for reserve assets. The remedy lies in a downward adjustment of the dollar to a “fairer” value, which he argues “can be redressed by tariffs”. He outlines multilateral and unilateral strategies for achieving this adjustment, while emphasizing that any intervention must be implemented gradually to avoid triggering destabilizing outflows from the U.S. Treasury market.

Why the comparison to the Plaza Accord of 1985?

The Plaza Accord was a multilateral agreement between the G5 nations – the U.S., Japan, West Germany, France, and the U.K – that also intended to correct the U.S. trade deficit. Its goal was to weaken the USD through coordinated currency intervention and fiscal adjustment (primarily by non-U.S. participants) to rebalance global trade flows.

However, several key conditions that made the Plaza Accord possible in 1985 no longer hold today. First, most central banks in developed countries no longer intervene in the currency markets (unless there is a financial stability concern). In addition, China is now a dominant global trade power and America’s primary trade rival. It is unlikely to voluntarily allow the yuan to appreciate vis-a-vis USD to achieve U.S. policy objectives. If anything, China is more likely to let its currency depreciate to support domestic growth.

While the Plaza Accord succeeded in weakening the dollar in the short term, it failed to deliver lasting improvements in trade balances, largely because the underlying dynamic of low private savings and high government borrowing in the U.S. remained unaddressed.

The Non-Starter Playbook of the Mar-a-Lago Accord (05/01/2025)
https://economics.td.com/us-mar-a-lago-accord
=====

There are actually 5 parts to the Mar-a-Lago Accord all of which will negatively effect workers and retirees. And just like his Big Beautiful Bill you can bet the top .001 percent will reap the benefits.

=====
The “Mar-a-Lago Accord” is a set of proposed international economic and foreign policy strategies aimed at restructuring global trade, shifting manufacturing back to the U.S., and devaluing the dollar. The 5-step framework involves these key actions:

* Step 1: Implement Tariffs

Levy tariffs on imports to penalize adversarial nations, generate revenue, and make domestic U.S. manufacturing more competitive. These tariffs are used as “sticks” to force trading partners to the negotiating table.

* Step 2: Leverage Defense and Security

Link trade concessions directly with global defense commitments. The administration demands allies benefiting from the U.S. security umbrella (such as NATO members) contribute more by increasing their own military spending or making major investments in the U.S.

* Step 3: Weaken the U.S. Dollar

Facilitate a coordinated, managed devaluation of the dollar to boost American exports. While maintaining the dollar’s status as the global reserve currency, this step aims to make other countries’ currencies stronger, removing their export advantages against the U.S.

* Step 4: Establish a Sovereign Wealth Fund

Create a national wealth fund, which the administration aims to fund by monetizing federal assets—such as public lands or gold reserves. These funds can then be deployed into foreign exchange markets to help apply downward pressure on the U.S. dollar.

* Step 5: Debt Restructuring (The “Nuclear Option”)

Pressure foreign creditors—using security and trade leverage—to swap their existing, higher-interest, short-term U.S. Treasuries for unconventional long-term (e.g., 100-year) zero-coupon bonds. This highly controversial step is designed to help the U.S. manage and reduce its massive debt servicing costs.

Google AI [trump and the mar-a-lago accords 5 steps]
=====

In the following presentation Porter Stansberry uses the term “Trump’s New Dollar” to describe a looming devaluation or “stealth default” on U.S. government debt, driven by unchecked federal spending and political agendas to intentionally lower the value of the U.S. currency. Basically Trump wants to erase our 40 Trillion dollar debt by further debasing the dollar. The government will be paying back the debt in cheaper dollars by further debasing the dollar. And the worker and retiree will pay for it through a lower standard of living.

=====
President Trump is replacing the U.S. dollar.
https://porterandcompanyresearch.co/mrln/?caid=8ya59swu&_ef_transaction_id=b3bf837aa91542d19b5ab6627a230052&aid=46&sub1=&sub2=144085&sub3=
=====

=====
Financial publisher Porter Stansberry uses the term “Trump’s New Dollar” to describe a looming devaluation or “stealth default” on U.S. government debt, driven by unchecked federal spending and political agendas to intentionally lower the value of the U.S. currency. He ties this concept to the following key themes and warnings:

* Monetary Reset: Stansberry warns that the U.S. is facing a fiscal reckoning due to unsustainable entitlement programs and rising debt. He predicts a “Nixon shock”-style event where the government, instead of officially defaulting, debases the currency to pay its obligations, severely eroding the purchasing power of the traditional dollar.

* Plaza Accord 2.0: He points to rumblings from the administration—sometimes dubbed a “Mar-a-Lago Accord”—aimed at actively lowering the value of the U.S. dollar. The administration’s goal is to improve the U.S. trade deficit, boost exports, and encourage domestic manufacturing.

* Asset Protection: Because he views the traditional dollar as compromised, Stansberry recommends protecting wealth by investing in what he calls “hard assets” and alternative monetary systems, such as Bitcoin and gold, as well as high-quality, cash-generating businesses.

Google AI [what does Porter Stansberry mean by Trumps New Dollar]
=====

The Trump Administration is labeling opponents of Data Centers as “Anti-Tech Extremists”

Remember how Biden labeled parents as terrorists for speaking out against LGBTQ curriculums? Well today The Trump Administration is labeling opponents of Data Centers as “Anti-Tech Extremists,” and people have already been sent to jail for protesting. These affronts to free speech are not acceptable whether they are perpetrated by Biden or Trump. And once again Globalist Corporate Media fails to point out Trumps hypocrisy.

=====
STORY #1 - Americans who question AI data centers are now being treated like potential terrorists under a disturbing new law enforcement category called “anti-tech extremism.”

STORY #2 - A Texas mother was arrested for warning her neighbors on Facebook about contaminated water, and many Americans are starting to wonder if this is where the country is headed next. If residents begin speaking out about water shortages, pollution, or health concerns tied to massive AI infrastructure projects, will police eventually start treating those people like criminals too?

STORY #3 - A shocking new study shows tick-induced meat allergies have exploded nearly 9,800% in the U.S. since 2013, while some researchers are openly discussing the idea of weaponizing ticks to discourage people from eating meat.

Concerned About Data Centers? You Might Be a “Terrorist” | Daily Pulse
Leaked documents reveal that ordinary Americans worried about water shortages, farmland destruction, and AI data centers are now being viewed as potential threats.

The Vigilant Fox May 26, 2026

Concerned About Data Centers? You Might Be a "Terrorist" | Daily Pulse

=====
=====
Now, there is stigma associated with AI data center protests around the country. Go to city council meetings and sound off because humongous data centers are invading your space? Carry a sign on the street criticizing data centers? Criticize people like Sam Altman or Elon Musk on social media? You could be tagged a ‘neo-Luddite’ and find yourself on a government naughty list, being surveilled everywhere you show up.

This is not speculation. As Wired reports, “in California, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin, state and local police have removed or arrested speakers at town halls who criticize data centers, in one case before they were even allowed to speak.”

The scale of opposition to AI is massive: 70% of Americans oppose local data center construction, hundreds of groups are active in 42 states, and $156 billion in projects faced delays or were blocked in 2025 alone. Technocrats hate anyone who rains on their parade.

It Figures: Feds Go After ‘Anti-Tech Extremists’ As AI Hatred Grows (05/28/2026)
https://www.technocracy.news/figures-feds-go-after-anti-tech-extremists-as-ai-hatred-grows/
=====
=====
Three people were arrested at a City of Port Washington meeting Dec. 2 where protesters spoke out against a $15 billion artificial intelligence data center campus for tech giants OpenAI and Oracle. The arrests came during public comment after a woman speaking against the project led a brief chant of “Recall, recall, recall.”

Watch arrest of woman protesting AI data center protester in Wisconsin (12/03/2025)

=====

Concluding Remarks

Trumps push for massive AI Data Centers is problematic for so many reasons, which is why I am writing a series of essays on the subject. Globalist Corporate Media has insulated Trump from any accountability regarding these Data Centers or his economic policies: all of which are against the interests of the American People. If I were a reporter I’d have a host of questions for Trump that will never be asked.

* Could you explain the need for all these massive Data Centers?

* Why should we expect AI to find a cure for cancer when you won’t remove Fluoride from the water supply, won’t criminalize the use of Glyphosate etc.

* Didn’t you lie to the American People when you said you’d ban CBDCs but then rolled out Stablecoin. After all both can be used to usher in Digital ID, Digital Currency and ultimately a Globalist Cashless Society.

* Will these AI Surveillance Centers be prohibited from collecting blockchain data on every citizen to prevent the establishment of a Digital Cashless Society.

Thanks for reading. If you can afford a paid subscription that would be great. If you can’t please share this essay as widely as possible.